The Top 22 Social Media Monitoring Tools 2026

As generative AI reshapes how people research, learn, and make decisions, a new discipline is emerging: Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). Just as SEO helped brands get discovered on Google, GEO ensures they appear accurately and positively within AI-powered platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot. With millions of consumers now turning to generative engines instead of search engines, GEO is fast becoming essential for marketing and PR professionals looking to influence how their brand shows up in this new discovery layer, where conversations, not clicks, determine visibility.

What is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)?

Why Should Marketing & Insights Teams Care About GEO?

How Does GEO Work? Key Mechanisms & Signals

What's the Difference Between GEO and SEO?

Increase Your GEO Readiness with Meltwater

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is the practice of ensuring that AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Llama, etc., provide accurate, positive, and up-to-date information about your brand when users ask questions. These platforms are referred to as Generative Engines, Answer Engines, or Large Language Models (LLMs). They are increasingly used by consumers to research purchases and make decisions.

GEO is a way of making sure that AI platforms give people the right information about a company’s brand and products. 

For example, if a person asks ChatGPT: “What is a good family car for camping trips?” then the auto manufacturers would want ChatGPT to suggest their SUV models, and list the benefits. To make sure that happens, the auto brands need to use GEO.

GEO ensures your brand shows up correctly within these AI-generated responses.

The practice of GEO involves several steps, but it is mostly focused on creating, structuring, and publishing content in the best way to influence the responses given by AI Generative Engines. 

In this article we’ll go into the detail of how GEO works, why it’s important, and how you can use it to make sure your brand is featured positively in AI platforms.

Sometimes, generative engine optimization (GEO) is referred to as answer engine optimization (AEO). Learn more about the differences and similarities of GEO and AEO, and take a look at the best AEO tools.

For a long time marketers have been able to rely on the fact that consumers almost exclusively use Google to research buying decisions. So they have been able to use Search Engine Optimization (SEO) to ensure their brand’s website appears in the organic search results, or use paid search advertising to buy ads on relevant search results. 

This is a highly effective way of targeting the right audience at the right time. But now things are changing.

LLMs aren't just another channel. They sit on top of this ecosystem. They synthesize everything into a single conversation.

Allie Konchar, Partner & Chief Client Officer, Omniscient

Changing user behavior: AI + conversational search

Increasingly, consumers are using tools like ChatGPT to research their buying decisions. Data from Meltwater’s 2026 Global Digital Report shows that ChatGPT.com is now the fifth most visited website on the web.

While search engines remain popular, many search queries now produce an AI generated summary that often provide enough information to divert users away from clicking through to websites, because their question has already been answered. McKinsey reports that around half of all Google search queries already produce AI generated summaries, and that number is increasing all the time. 

With conventional web search, consumers are performing research manually, trying to find trustworthy sources and sifting through information to reach the answers they seek. But with Generative Engines, the AI is performing the research automatically, using its existing base knowledge alongside supplemental information pulled from more recent online sources. A search engine shows users where to find answers, while a Generative Engine just gives them the answer. 

For marketers, the key takeaway is that few top-of-funnel consumers are visiting your website, because during the awareness phase their information needs are being met by Generative Engines. This makes it more difficult to move them down into the consideration phase. 

TIP: For more data around growing AI usage and online consumer behavior, download our 2026 Global Digital Report, featuring nearly 700 pages statistics to help inform your GEO strategies next year.

You already know that everybody is talking about AI, and all of your competitors are having the same discussions as you about what it means for their marketing strategy. Those who move decisively to implement GEO, ensuring their brands are represented clearly and positively in Generative Engines, will capture the largest share of those consumers who start their buying journey with an AI query. 

Those who ignore GEO will lose ground, as growing numbers of consumers turn from search engines to Generative Engines, the size of the audiences that can be reached through conventional search marketing will decrease. 

How do generative engines (LLMs) surface content?

It’s important to understand that while Generative Engines are based on similar technology, they all work a little differently. Broadly speaking they all use two different sources of knowledge to provide an answer to a query: 

<table class="table-primary alternate-color">
  <caption>How Generative Engines (LLMs) Surface Content</caption>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>Generative Engine</th>
      <th>Primary Retrieval Method</th>
      <th>Sources Most Often Cited</th>
      <th>Sources Less Likely to Be Cited</th>
      <th>Notes on Behavior</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>ChatGPT</td>
      <td>Bing search + internal training data</td>
      <td>Reuters, AP News, Wikipedia, Encyclopedic sources</td>
      <td>Social media platforms (X/Twitter, Instagram)</td>
      <td>Prefers authoritative, neutral, structured sources with high trust signals.</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Google Gemini</td>
      <td>Google Search + YouTube + Knowledge Graph</td>
      <td>Reddit, YouTube, Google-indexed blogs</td>
      <td>X/Twitter</td>
      <td>Strongly favors user-generated content, community threads, and Google-owned properties.</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Perplexity</td>
      <td>Real-time web crawling + citation-first retrieval</td>
      <td>News publishers, reputable blogs, research papers</td>
      <td>Low-trust UGC</td>
      <td>Most transparent engine — always cites sources and updates in real time.</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Claude</td>
      <td>Internal training data + selected retrieval</td>
      <td>Academic sources, reputable news, long-form articles</td>
      <td>Short-form social media</td>
      <td>Prefers long-form text and well-structured explanatory content.</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

Training Data: All LLMs begin by being trained on a huge volume of existing content and data — we’re talking about dozens of terabytes (a terabyte is 1,000Gb). This training data comes from a wide variety of sources (including your website), and gives the LLM its base knowledge about the world. The LLM does not have any knowledge of anything that happened after its initial training. 

Live Web Search: To overcome the knowledge cut-off problem, the training data is supplemented with fresh information gathered from the internet. If the Generative Engine thinks that a user’s query would benefit from more up to date information than it already has, it fetches new content from trusted online sources and works that into its response. Google uses its own search engine to find fresh information, while ChatGPT uses various sources, including Microsoft Bing.

It’s also important to note that AI does not quote any of this content verbatim in its responses. Much like a human, it uses the information it has learned to inform its own answer, and that can include information from various sources, including the press, competitors, consumer reviews. So don’t expect it to always be on-message!

Another key point is that unlike a search engine, an LLM does not have an index of content which it searches to find answers. It would be impossible to search ChatGPT for all mentions of your brand — that’s simply not how it works. 

An LLM is more similar to a human brain, in that it has a lot of knowledge stored in patterns and relationships between words and concepts. It is extremely difficult, verging on impossible, to examine and understand the detail of an LLM’s learned knowledge because of the sheer scale and complexity; this is a challenge referred to as Black Box AI. 

But we do understand how Generative Engines work at a high level, and we can analyze the kind of responses they produce for relevant queries, which gives us insight into how we should optimize our content for increased visibility.

What content features improve GEO-visibility?

Bear in mind that when you’re optimizing content for Generative Engines, the goal is to write copy that is easier for AI to digest and incorporate into its responses.

Clarity: Avoid overly elaborate language. Do not use corporate-jargon. Keep it simple, professional, and to the point. Leave no room for ambiguity. 

Authority: Wherever possible back up your statements with data from reputable sources, quotes from experts or industry leaders, and reference-able proof points. 

Structure: Organize your pages well with clear titles, headings, and subheadings. Use heading tags (H1, H2, etc) correctly to specify the hierarchy of your content. 

Recency: AI platforms look for more recent information from trusted sources to supplement their base knowledge, so in both owned and earned media, aim to publish fresh content recently.

In many respects GEO shares principles with good SEO practice. If you write consistently high quality content which addresses the needs of your target audience, and structure it correctly on well designed, standards compliant web pages, you will succeed.

First you need to understand your starting point. Meltwater’s GenAI Lens is a tool that gives brands insight into how they are discussed by all major Generative Engines, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, and Deepseek. 

With GenAI Lens you’ll be able to understand how your brand is already featured in LLMs, what source websites are used in those responses, and whether outdated or inaccurate information is being used. 

We know that LLMs pull content from the web, which they use to inform their responses. So whatever is said about your brand online will significantly affect how Generative Engines talk about your company. 

Start with your own website, this is the first place LLMs will look for information about your organization. But also focus on trusted, high authority third party sites like the mainstream news and specialist media within your industry, because these are the kinds of sources that LLMs will use. GenAI Lens can show you which websites the leading LLMS use to source information about your brand. 

Once you have a comprehensive audit of how your brand is currently portrayed online, you can perform a gap analysis against your desired messaging, and build a plan for how to reach that objective.

Tip: AI brand monitoring, AI media monitoring, and LLM monitoring will help you understand your online footprint. Learn how to track your LLM visibility and how to track LLM brand mentions.

An important difference between GEO and SEO is understanding how people search differently when using Generative Engines. Users interact conversationally with AI, and are likely to ask more complex questions in natural language, compared to simple keywords or short queries in a search engine. So it’s useful to get an idea of what kind of questions people will ask about your brand or industry, to help plan your GEO content.

Tip: Learn more about AI visibility for retail brands.

Unlike search engines, at present the leading Generative Engines do not share data on popular user queries, so it’s not easy to find out exactly what people are asking about your business. But you can look at popular keyword searches associated with your brand, and brainstorm the most likely questions people will ask Generative Engines. 

You can also use a social listening platform, like Meltwater Explore+ to analyze social media conversations around your brand and industry, to gain insight into common questions. Once you have mapped out all of the most likely questions people might ask, you can start creating content that answers those questions.

Tip: Learn how to connect social listening with generative engine optimization. 

Conventional SEO was built around search queries but GEO requires thinking in concepts, context, and authority — you need to focus on the intent of the query, rather than simply trying to match keywords. 

LLMs prioritize sources that provide comprehensive, well-structured, and contextually rich content. Focus your content strategy on:

Educational depth: Long-form resources that answer questions end-to-end. Publish explainers, FAQs, and data-backed insights that answer “how” and “why.”

Credibility signals: Citations, quotes, and data from reputable sources (analyst studies, thought leadership, or trusted media).

Rich media: Generative Engines pull information from videos and images as well as text content, so make use of varied content formats. 

Consistency across channels: LLMs learn from media, social, and owned content together; ensure your narratives are aligned across them.

The key thing is to ensure that your content is genuinely helpful in answering those questions you mapped out. If your content is too focused on sales messages, it’s less likely to be used by the LLMs.

TIP: Discover innovative AI-generated content examples to enhance your digital strategy.

You can optimize the content published on your website and owned channels, but LLMs also source information from trusted third party websites. That means PR has a key role to play in ensuring your brand is featured in high authority earned media, including news features, expert comment from your spokespeople, product reviews, and any other kind of brand story traditionally generated through a media relations campaign.

Tip: Learn more about the importance of earned media for GEO and about PR Pitch GEO optimization.

The tricky part is that unlike advertising, which can tell exciting and attention grabbing stories, PR professionals are limited to working only with the facts. But while you cannot always control the outcome of media outreach activity, ensuring that PR and GEO are aligned will help increase the volume of third party sources that feature the right messaging.

Tip: Learn how GEO is reshaping PR strategies.

Meltwater’s GenAI Lens gives you the ability to track your GEO performance over time, so you can understand whether your strategy is working well and spot areas where you need to improve. The tool provides visualizations that show brand sentiment, emotion, key phrases, people, products and things mentioned, alongside citations.

Armed with this information you can identify gaps in your GEO strategy where you might need to create more or better content. You can also discover which third party sources have the greatest impact on your GEO performance, and use that information to optimize PR outreach to focus on the most important media. 

Like SEO, this is a process of constant iteration and improvement. GEO should not be seen as a one-off project that will generate positive results in perpetuity, but rather an ongoing activity that needs to be integrated with the broader marketing mix.

Tip: Learn How to Measure PR Performance Across LLMs and Generative Search, and understand how to report on LLM visibility.

Which Media Sources to Prioritize for GEO

When an LLM processes a user query, it can often detect that the response might require more recent information than it has access to in its original training data. In that situation it will look online for more up to date content that will help it to form a more accurate answer, but where exactly do Generative Engines look for this information?

At Meltwater we used GenAI Lens to research which content sources the leading AI platforms were most likely to reference in their responses, and there were distinct differences between them all:

Open AI ChatGPT: Heavily favors text-based news and newswires (Reuters, AP, PR Newswire) and reference sites (Wikipedia). Much less likely to cite social media and UGC. 

Google Gemini: Leans towards high quality UGC from sites like Reddit and YouTube, as well as other online sources within the Google ecosystem. Does not index X/Twitter content. 

Google Search AI Overviews: Highly focused on UGC from Reddit and YouTube, as well as Facebook, Yahoo and LinkedIn. 

xAI Grok: Strongly skewed towards conversational UGC from X and Reddit. Less likely to cite traditional reference sources like Wikipedia, YouTube or academic sites. 

Unlike SEO, where most practitioners were happy to optimize only for Google, in GEO we have to consider the nuances of several different platforms; at the very least ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews. In short, it’s good practice to ensure you have up to date content propagated across a wide range of platforms where LLMs might look for supplemental information.  

In terms of which online sources are most likely to be referenced overall, we looked at several categories and charted the most frequently cited websites:

<ul class="medium">
	<li><b>Social Media & UGC</b></li>
    <ul>
		<li>reddit.com: 43.1%</li>
		<li>youtube.com: 17.9%</li>
        <li>facebook.com: 11.1%</li>
		<li>linkedin.com: 9.2%</li>
        <li>quora.com: 5.6%</li>
	</ul>
	<li><b>Consumer Reviews</b></li>
	<ul>
		<li>glassdoor.com: 21.6%</li>
		<li>indeed.com: 20.6%</li>
        <li>trustpilot.com: 15.7%</li>
		<li>bbb.org: 9.9%</li>
        <li>yelp.com: 8.0%</li>
	</ul>
	<li><b>Travel</b></li>
    <ul>
		<li>tripadvisor.com: 83.2%</li>
		<li>expedia.com: 10.0%</li>
        <li>booking.com: 6.8%</li>
	</ul>
	<li><b>News & Media</b></li>	
    <ul>
		<li>yahoo.com: 26.5%</li>
		<li>prnewswire.com: 10.8%</li>
        <li>reuters.com: 9.0%</li>
		<li>forbes.com: 6.7%</li>
        <li>usnews.com: 6.7%</li>
	</ul>
    <li><b>Academic & Science</b></li>	
    <ul>
		<li>nih.gov: 53.6%</li>
		<li>researchgate.net: 14.5%</li>
        <li>sciencedirect.com: 10.0%</li>
		<li>jhu.edu: 7.5%</li>
        <li>cdc.gov: 5.8%</li>
	</ul>
    <li><b>Market Research & Consulting</b></li>	
    <ul>
		<li>statista.com: 18.8%</li>
		<li>mordorintelligence.com: 16.3%</li>
        <li>gartner.com: 14.9%</li>
		<li>mckinsey.com: 13.5%</li>
        <li>cbinsights.com: 13.0%</li>
	</ul>
    <li><b>Business & Financial</b></li>	
    <ul>
		<li>investing.com: 14.1%</li>
		<li>morningstar.com: 13.2%</li>
        <li>nasdaq.com: 11.4%</li>
		<li>nerdwallet.com: 10.4%</li>
        <li>seekingalpha.com: 8.8%</li>
	</ul>
    <li><b>Government & Public Sector</b></li>	
    <ul>
		<li>weforum.org: 20.6%</li>
		<li>europa.eu: 17.8%</li>
        <li>canada.ca: 12.7%</li>
		<li>imf.org: 11.5%</li>
        <li>sec.gov: 10.1%</li>
	</ul>
</ul>

Many teams focus on keywords, backlinks, and meta tags, but LLMs prioritize context, authority, and relevance. GEO requires content that answers full questions with clear, verifiable information, not keyword stuffing or link chasing.

2. Ignoring source credibility and transparency

AI models reward trustworthy, well-cited content. Publishing unverified claims, outdated statistics, or missing citations can lower visibility or lead to inaccurate AI summaries of your brand. Always include reputable data sources, authorship, and dates.

3. Failing to monitor how your brand appears in LLMs

Without ongoing media monitoring, brands miss when GenAI models misrepresent their products or replicate misinformation. LLM tracking tools like Meltwater’s GenAI Lens can surface these blind spots and help correct or update narratives quickly.

What is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)? & How to Do It

Generative AI is everywhere now. You see it in content, campaigns, customer experiences, and even internal workflows. 

It promises speed, scale, and efficiency, but there’s a harder question sitting underneath all that progress; Do your audiences actually trust it?

That’s what we set out to understand in our latest report with YouGov, based on responses from nearly 10,000 people across seven global markets. The results point to something many brands are starting to feel in practice - AI is a double-edged sword, offering cost savings and productivity gains, but potentially damaging customer trust.

Consumers Aren’t as Excited as You Might Think

The Real Concern Isn’t AI, It’s What AI Enables

Context Shapes Acceptance More than Capability

AI Can Cost You Trust if You’re Not Careful

Consumers Aren’t as Excited by Gen AI as You Might Think

There’s a gap between how the industry talks about AI and how people actually feel about it.

You might assume that excitement is high because, after all, AI dominates headlines and product roadmaps for seemingly most companies. But when you look at consumer sentiment, the picture is more mixed. In fact, more people (51%) feel uncertain or sceptical than excited (39%) about a future shaped by generative AI.

That hesitation means your audience isn’t automatically on board with AI-driven content, no matter how advanced or efficient it is. By introducing a new tool into your workflow, you’re introducing a new layer of doubt into how your content is perceived.

Younger audiences are more open, with 48% of those aged 25-34 reporting that they are excited by AI, compared to only 31% of those aged over 55. 

Some markets are more optimistic than others too; Germany (56%) and Singapore (55%) show the highest levels of excitement towards AI, while the UK (23%) and the U.S. (25%) are the least excited. But overall, enthusiasm is far from universal. You can’t assume broad AI acceptance, you have to earn it.

The Real Concern isn’t AI, it’s What AI Enables

When people talk about AI risk, they’re rarely talking about the technology itself, they’re talking about outcomes.

Consumers are deeply concerned about how AI-generated content could be used. Fake news, scams, misleading information, and the erosion of authenticity all rank high on their list of worries. These aren’t fringe concerns; they’re held by a large majority of respondents across every market we studied.

That tells you something important: your audience is not evaluating AI in isolation, but judging it based on the potential for misuse.

So when your brand uses AI, people don’t always see the efficiency and cost savings that drove you to adopt the technology; they see risk, and unless you address that risk head-on, it can quietly undermine your credibility.

Many consumers believe they can spot AI-generated content, but at the same time, an overwhelming majority worry that people in general won’t be able to tell what’s real and what isn’t.

That contradiction creates a strange dynamic in which, on a personal level, people feel confident, but on a societal level they feel uneasy.

For brands, that means trust is fragile. Even if your content is accurate and well-intentioned, it exists in an environment where people expect confusion, misinformation, and blurred lines between human and machine.

For brands, the battle is more than fighting for consumer attention now, they’re competing to earn trust. 

Not all AI use is judged equally; the context of how and where it’s used matters when audiences form their opinions. 

Consumers are more comfortable with AI in areas like entertainment and advertising, where 53% and 47% respectively said they found it acceptable, perhaps because these are spaces where creativity, experimentation, and even a bit of artificiality are expected, so the stakes feel lower.

But shift that same AI into news (21% acceptable), politics (18% acceptable), or other high-trust environments, and attitudes change quickly. Acceptance drops and resistance rises.

This is one of the clearest signals from the data; People don’t reject AI outright, instead they evaluate it based on context, intent, and perceived impact.

So the question for your brand isn’t just “Should we use AI?” It’s “Where does AI make sense, and where does it damage trust?”

One of the strongest findings in the report is the impact of AI on brand trust. A significant portion (32%) of consumers say they would trust a brand less if they knew its content was generated using AI, whereas only a small minority (15%) say it would increase their trust.

That imbalance should get your attention, since it means AI doesn’t come with a built-in trust advantage; rather, in many cases, it starts at a disadvantage.

It gets worse when certain lines are crossed, for example, if AI-generated content feels misleading, if it’s used without disclosure, or if it replaces human creativity entirely, trust drops sharply.

So if you’re using AI, you need to think beyond efficiency and consider the impact on audience perception. 

If there’s one takeaway from the Trust in the Age of Generative AI report that you act on, make it this; Consumers expect you to be transparent about your use of AI, as a basic requirement.

An overwhelming majority say it’s important that brands clearly disclose when content has been created using generative AI, and that expectation holds across every market in the study.

This is an interesting shift in how trust works, because in the past, brands could focus on outcomes, but now the process matters too. People want to know how content is made, not just what it says, and if they feel you’re hiding something, even unintentionally, it can erode trust quickly.

Transparency has become a signal of credibility.

AI is not going away. You’re going to use it, your competitors are going to use it, and your audience knows that. The difference will come down to how you use it.

Brands that win in this next phase won’t be the ones that adopt AI the fastest, but the ones that use it thoughtfully, communicate it clearly, and keep human judgment at the centre of what they do.

That means being deliberate about where AI adds value, setting clear guidelines for disclosure, and monitoring how your audience responds, not just assuming they’ll accept it.

Most of all, it means recognising that trust is now part of your AI strategy.

This is just a snapshot of what we found. The full report breaks down how attitudes differ by country, age group, and content type. It also explores where AI is gaining acceptance, where it’s facing resistance, and what that means for your communications strategy.

If you’re thinking about how to use AI without damaging trust, it’s worth a closer look.

Download the full report to see the complete data and insights.

Most consumers are sceptical about AI-generated content. Over half feel uncertain, and many say it can reduce trust in brands using it.

Trust issues stem from concerns about misinformation, fake news, scams, and lack of authenticity enabled by AI-generated content.

Does AI-generated content hurt brand trust?

Yes, it can. Around one-third of consumers say they trust brands less when they learn content is AI-generated, especially without disclosure.

Acceptance depends on context. Consumers are more comfortable with AI in marketing and entertainment, but less so in news, politics, or high-trust industries.

Many believe they can identify AI content, but most worry that others cannot, contributing to broader uncertainty and distrust.

How important is AI transparency for brands?

Transparency is essential. Most consumers expect brands to clearly disclose when AI is used to create content.

Should brands use AI in content creation?

Yes, but carefully. Brands should use AI where it adds value, maintain human oversight, and align usage with audience expectations.

How can brands build trust when using AI?

To build trust, brands should disclose AI use, avoid misleading content, apply AI in appropriate contexts, and prioritise human input.

Trust in the Age of AI: What Consumers Really Think About AI Generated Content

Influencer marketing is evolving, and so is the way brands measure success. That’s why Meltwater is proud to announce a new partnership with YouTube, integrating YouTube’s Creator Partnerships API directly into our Influencer Marketing platform.

As one of a select group of partners chosen by YouTube, this collaboration brings verified, first-party data into every stage of the influencer marketing workflow, marking a significant step forward for how brands approach YouTube as a marketing channel.

The Challenge: Growing Investment, Limited Visibility

A Strategic Shift for Influencer Marketing

More Than Discovery: End-to-End Campaign Management

Why this Partnership Matters for Influencer Marketing

FAQ: Meltwater Influencer Marketing & YouTube’s Creator Partnerships API

YouTube has become one of the most powerful platforms for creator-led marketing. With long-form content, deeper storytelling, and highly engaged audiences, it plays an increasingly central role in brand strategy.

But as investment in YouTube grows, so do expectations. Marketers are facing a persistent challenge: public metrics only tell part of the story, making it difficult to fully understand true performance. At the same time, audience fit is hard to validate before campaigns even begin, and campaign impact is often fragmented or unclear once they are underway. 

As a result, brands are investing more in YouTube, but without full confidence in performance or ROI.

The Solution: Verified Data, Built Into the Workflow

Through this new partnership, Meltwater Influencer Marketing integrates verified, non-public YouTube data directly from creators in the YouTube Partner Program into influencer workflows, unlocking a new level of transparency and control.

But there’s more to this story than simply providing additional data for marketers - it’s about transforming how YouTube campaigns are planned, executed, and measured.

Discover and evaluate creators using verified performance and audience insights

Validate audience fit before investing in partnerships

Track campaign performance at the video level

Connect creator activity directly to measurable outcomes

Optimize strategy and budget based on real performance data

In short, YouTube becomes a measurable, optimizable channel, not a black box.

This partnership represents a broader shift in how YouTube is used within the marketing mix, empowering brands to move beyond discovery and treat YouTube as a true performance channel.

<table>
  <thead class="table-primary alternate-color">
    <tr>
      <th><strong>Before</strong></th>
      <th><strong>After</strong></th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>YouTube was a partially visible channel</td>
      <td>YouTube is a fully integrated, measurable channel</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Decisions relied on surface-level metrics</td>
      <td>Decisions are driven by verified, first-party data</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Reporting was fragmented</td>
      <td>Campaign performance is clearly tracked end-to-end</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

While many platforms focus on helping brands find creators, Meltwater Influencer Marketing goes further. Our platform enables teams to:

Discover: Search and filter YouTube creators.

Vet: Evaluate engagement quality, audience demographics, and content performance using verified data.

Activate: Seamlessly manage campaigns and assign YouTube deliverables.

Measure: Track video-level performance and access unified campaign reporting.

This end-to-end approach ensures that every stage of a campaign is informed by reliable, actionable insights.

For marketers, this partnership unlocks an entirely new level of confidence in YouTube investments. Instead of relying on surface-level metrics or post-campaign assumptions, brands can now make decisions grounded in verified, first-party data at every stage of the campaign lifecycle.

With deeper visibility into creator performance and audience quality, marketers can make smarter, more informed decisions about who they partner with, reducing risk and ensuring stronger alignment from the outset. 

This means validating audience fit before committing budget, not after results come in.

At the same time, campaign impact becomes far easier to prove. With access to more accurate, video-level performance data, brands can clearly connect creator activity to real outcomes, moving beyond vanity metrics to demonstrate true business value. This level of transparency not only strengthens reporting, but also builds internal confidence among stakeholders.

The ability to track performance more precisely also opens the door to ongoing optimization. So instead of waiting until a campaign ends to evaluate success, marketers can monitor results in real time and adjust strategy, creative direction, or budget allocation based on what’s actually working.

Ultimately, this shifts influencer marketing on YouTube from an experimental or awareness-driven tactic into a measurable, performance-driven growth channel. 

As the space continues to mature, this level of measurement is no longer a “nice to have” but a requirement for brands looking to scale their investments with confidence and accountability.

This isn’t just a new feature or data integration, it’s a shift in how YouTube fits into the broader influencer marketing ecosystem. 

With verified data embedded across discovery, vetting, activation, and measurement, Meltwater Influencer Marketing is helping brands turn YouTube into a fully measurable, performance-driven channel.


FAQ: Meltwater Influencer Marketing & YouTube’s Creator Partnerships API 

What makes this YouTube partnership different from existing influencer marketing tools?

Unlike platforms that rely primarily on public data, Meltwater Influencer Marketing integrates verified, first-party data directly from YouTube. This provides a deeper, more accurate view of creator performance, audience quality, and campaign impact—enabling brands to make more confident, data-driven decisions across the entire campaign lifecycle.

Do brands need to take any additional steps to access YouTube data in their campaign?

Yes. To access verified campaign data, brands must connect their YouTube account in the platform and include YouTube deliverables within their campaigns. In addition, creators need to link their content through YouTube’s ecosystem. These steps ensure data accuracy and alignment with YouTube’s measurement framework.

How is verified YouTube data made available in Klear?

Verified data is available for creators who have opted into YouTube’s Partner Program. This ensures that audience and performance insights are based on real viewer behavior, providing a more accurate and reliable view of creator performance.

What kind of insights can brands expect from this integration?

Brands gain access to richer performance insights beyond surface-level metrics, including video-level performance data, deeper audience insights, and more reliable engagement signals. This allows teams to evaluate creators more effectively, measure campaign success with greater precision, and optimize performance in real time.

Is this partnership only relevant for large-scale influencer programs?

Not at all. While enterprise teams will benefit from advanced measurement and reporting, brands of all sizes can use these capabilities to improve decision-making, reduce wasted spend, and scale their influencer marketing efforts more effectively. Whether running a single campaign or a global program, having access to verified data leads to better outcomes.

Introducing Verified YouTube Data in Meltwater Influencer Marketing

Thanks to decades of clinical research and public education initiatives, people all around the world know just how important sun protection is to skin health. But when it comes to sunscreen, which brands deserve your trust and which ones don’t? For an increasing number of consumers, answering that question begins with an LLM prompt. The resulting shortlist of brands can then become their guide on the buyer journey to a more confident purchase. 

According to our GenAI Lens analysis of LLM recommendations for the best facial SPF:

Dermatologist-backed brands dominate the category.

Beauty editors, review platforms, and medical sources dominate the leading sources.

Brand-owned content didn’t move the needle.

Here’s what brands in sun protection and beyond need to know about where and how they appear in LLM recommendations.

Methodology: This analysis is based on GenAI Lens data on LLM responses to the prompt Best SPF for your face generated from March 14 to April 14, 2026, across seven LLM modes: Claude, Deepseek, ChatGPT, Llama, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity. Request a demo to see how an AI visibility analysis can surface actionable insights tailored to your industry and brand.

Download a one-page summary of key findings and takeaways from this GenAI Lens analysis.

AI Visibility Tiers: Which Sunscreen Brands Did LLMs Surface Most?

Which AI Models Surface Which Sunscreen Brands?

Key Takeaways: What Our Sunscreen Analysis Means for All Brands

FAQ: LLM Recommendations and Sunscreen Brand Visibility

<div style="max-width:1000px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;background:#ffffff;border-radius:12px;box-shadow:0 4px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.08);border:1px solid #eaeaea;overflow:hidden;">

  
  <div style="height:6px;background:linear-gradient(90deg,#28bbbb,#b627a1);"></div>

  
  <div style="padding:16px 20px;">
    <div style="font-size:18px;font-weight:600;color:#000;">Facial Sunscreen Performance Overview</div>
  </div>

  
  <div style="padding:0 16px 16px 16px;">
    <table style="width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;table-layout:fixed;font-size:14px;color:#4c4d4f;text-align:center;">

      
      <tr>
        <th style="padding:12px;">Visibility Ranking</th>
        <th style="padding:12px;">Brand</th>
        <th style="padding:12px;">Visibility Score</th>
        <th style="padding:12px;background:#eef3f7;">Total Mentions</th>
        <th style="padding:12px;">Mention Rate</th>
      </tr>

      

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>1</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">EltaMD</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#28bbbb" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="60 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">60%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">198 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="51 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">51%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>2</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">La Roche-Posay</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#28bbbb" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="60 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">60%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">195 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="55 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">55%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>3</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">Supergoop</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="48 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">48%</text>
          </svg>

        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">144 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="46 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">46%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>4</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">CeraVe</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="33 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">33%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">88 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="33 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">33%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>5</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">Neutrogena</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="30 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">30%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">87 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="26 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">26%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>6</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">COOLA</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="23 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">23%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">50 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="15 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">15%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>7</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">Colorescience</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="25 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="16" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">16%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">36 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="14 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">14%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>8</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">Black Girl Sunscreen</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="9 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">9%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">15 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="7 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">7%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>9</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">Shiseido</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="10 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">10%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">11 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="5 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">5%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

      
      <tr style="border-top:1px solid #eaeaea;height:64px;">
        <td>10</td>
        <td style="font-weight:600;color:#28bbbb;">Sephora</td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="11 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">11%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
        <td style="background:#eef3f7;">8 </td>
        <td>
          <svg width="44" height="44" viewBox="0 0 36 36">
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#eaeaea" stroke-width="4" fill="none"/>
            <circle cx="18" cy="18" r="16" stroke="#ff6221" stroke-width="4" fill="none" stroke-dasharray="4 100" stroke-linecap="round" transform="rotate(-90 18 18)"/>
            <text x="18" y="21" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" fill="#000">4%</text>
          </svg>
        </td>
      </tr>

    </table>
  </div>
</div>

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)

Trust in the Age of AI: What Consumers Really Think About AI Generated Content

Introducing Verified YouTube Data in Meltwater Influencer Marketing

How LLMs Recommend Sunscreen Brands: An Analysis of AI Search Visibility in SPF

Generative AI in Market Research: Enhancing Insights and Decision-Making

From Coverage to Insight: How AI Assistants Turn Media Mentions into Strategic Recommendations

How to Track Brand Mentions in Claude AI

AI Visibility for Retail Brands: What It Is & How to Win

Gemini AI Brand Mention Tracking: Strategies & Tools

How Social Media Impacts AI Search Visibility

Perplexity Brand Monitoring: How to Monitor Your Brand Mentions on Perplexity AI

Narrative control in 2026: PR strategies for AI & GEO

Tracking Google AI Overview Performance: Brand Monitoring Guide

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)

Trust in the Age of AI: What Consumers Really Think About AI Generated Content

Introducing Verified YouTube Data in Meltwater Influencer Marketing

How LLMs Recommend Sunscreen Brands: An Analysis of AI Search Visibility in SPF

Generative AI in Market Research: Enhancing Insights and Decision-Making

From Coverage to Insight: How AI Assistants Turn Media Mentions into Strategic Recommendations

How to Track Brand Mentions in Claude AI

AI Visibility for Retail Brands: What It Is & How to Win

Gemini AI Brand Mention Tracking: Strategies & Tools

How Social Media Impacts AI Search Visibility

Perplexity Brand Monitoring: How to Monitor Your Brand Mentions on Perplexity AI

Narrative control in 2026: PR strategies for AI & GEO

Tracking Google AI Overview Performance: Brand Monitoring Guide

Interested in learning how Meltwater can help you? Fill out the form to learn more.